Search for: "Parks v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
(G052735; 20 Cal.App.5th 1156; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00605637.) [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:00 am
(G052735; 20 Cal.App.5th 1156; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00605637.) [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
In another recent trial court decision on SB 35 (Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
The Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am
The Case: Ridley v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Greenhill v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
As Justice Brown wrote, then of the Superior Court of Justice, in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
Sansi North America, LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:11 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Footnote 2 of the opinion says: "Although the rationale is unclear to this court, Proposition 64 differentiates cannabis, which must be in an unopened, sealed, container, from 'loose cannabis flower,' which only needs to be in a closed container. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Kolchinsky v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
He was convicted at the municipal court level and his conviction was affirmed in Superior Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:04 am
Los Angeles County Superior Court is the largest state court in the nation by volume. [read post]
