Search for: "Parr v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
In this guest post, long-time Katfriend Dan Bereskin (Bereskin & Parr LLP) gently chides the United States for its regular criticism of its northern neighbour for failure to take sufficient steps to deal with piracy and counterfeiting. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:52 pm
United States, 396 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:42 pm
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently held in City of Evansville v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm
For instance, in an Ericsson v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:47 pm
Here is a summary of the article: In the 1950s and 1960s, the southern [United] states struggled to respond to the civil rights decisions being issued by the U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals recently held in City of Evansville v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:06 am
Related Blog Posts Continuing Treatment Doctrine Can Toll the Statute of Limitations in a Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Case – Parr v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:00 am
The United States District Court for the District of Utah, however, denied Xcentric’s motion. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:04 pm
See Parr v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
On 10 July 2012, Tugendhat J heard the case of and Tilbrook v Parr. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
App. 2010). http://tinyurl.com/2backlm United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm
October 2012 (MC)), investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, sued for defamation (For example, see Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781; Cairns v Modi [2012] EWHC 756 (QB); [2012] EWCA Civ 1382; Tilbrook v Parr [2012] EWHC 1946 (QB). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
On 11 July 2012, there are applications in the cases of Qadir v Associated Newspapers and Tilbrook v Parr. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:13 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Jacobson v. [read post]
