Search for: "Partridge v. Partridge" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
” “In Michael Partridge Suzette Partridge v Healys LLP [2023] EWHC 2340 (KB) , a professional negligence action against the Defendant firm of solicitors, one of several allegations raised by the Claimants was that Healys had put themselves in a position of conflict under the terms of the CFA they were engaged under by advising the Claimants to settle at a mediation. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:14 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Partridge, offers a view on the overlaps between trade marks and domain names. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
The idea behind the popular trope, “You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater” comes from Schenck v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Solis Mexican Foods Inc., Partridge v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 10:07 am by Giles Peaker
Comment The position on High Court writs and on evictions under writ remains generally unsatisfactorily uncertain after Gupta v Partridge and as here. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:50 pm by Giles Peaker
The history of the N293A affair is in these posts (in reverse order), including the somewhat unfortunate coda of Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB). [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:18 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Wholesale Meats Ltd [7] Partridge v Botony Dental This was an Ontario civil action enforcing a Code remedy. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am by Giles Peaker
Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB) Those who have been readers of this blog for a while may recall our campaign about evictions by High Court Sheriffs where the writs were (wrongly) obtained as an administrative act by using form N293A. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:20 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
It looks simple enough and God knows it should be, and it reflects points raised in the Deregulation Act but as Tessa just pointed out to me it doesn’t have a saving clause, as per Lower Street Properties v. [read post]