Search for: "Party 1 v. Party 2" Results 41 - 60 of 37,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm by Michael W. Huseman
After taking the stand, she was allowed to read questions to herself from her notes for 1 1/2 days. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs sought a TRO enjoining defendants’ use of (1) any symbol, emblem and insignia of the Republican National Committee, namely the Elephant; and (2) the “Republican Party of the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
Generally, a party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must show: (1) complete domination and control of the subsidiary by the parent with respect to the transaction at issue; and (2) that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff that resulted in the plaintiff's injury (see Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin. , 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Do Gooder Prods., Inc. v American Jewish Theatre, Inc.,… [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:51 pm by Sophia Tang
’ (2015) 2(1) BCDR International Arbitration Review 171, 172. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 6:03 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
  A preliminary injunction is proper where the moving party proves the following two factors: (1) the likelihood that the moving party will ultimately prevail on the merits at the time of trial; and (2) that relative interim harm to the parties from issuance of the injunction weighs in that party’s favor. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:43 am by Matt Osenga
  Per Curiam In a 6-4-1 decision, the court held that infringement can be found in cases where (1) a party performs some of the steps of a patented method and induces another party to perform the remaining steps; and (2) where a party induces multiple third parties to collectively perform the steps of a patented method, but no single party has performed all of the steps itself. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Carvalho is a seminal case in trial practice, which permits questioning of one party [lawyers as well as doctors] as experts in their own case. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
  `A third party has actual authority to consent to a search if that third party has either (1) mutual use of the property by virtue of joint access, or (2) control for most purposes. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:57 am by emagraken
Strang, (2011) 21 B.L.R. (4th) 1 (B.C.S.C). as follows: I note in Bower v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In the public sector the intent of parties to a collective bargaining agreement to arbitrate a particular issue may not be presumedCounty of Rockland v Corr. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:23 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Florida courts examine the following three factors when determining whether to compel arbitration: (1) whether a valid written agreement to arbitrate exists; (2) whether an arbitrable issue exists; and (3) whether the right to arbitration was waived. [read post]