Search for: "Pat Gudridge" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 7:08 am by Paul Horwitz
The latest con law "jot" from Jotwell: Pat Gudridge on Reva Siegel, balkanization, and equal protection. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:19 am
Pat Gudridge: Michael and I regret to announce the death of our colleague John Gaubatz. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:46 pm
Pat Gudridge: I erased this entry on my first try at posting it. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:46 am
Pat Gudridge: Chief Justice Roberts is not succeeding, so far anyway, in engineering a spirit of unanimity in the Supreme Court — 5-4 Monday is proof of that. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:55 pm
Pat Gudridge: Davenport v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 3:30 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge Without much fuss, writing with easy, accomplished clarity, Nikolas Bowie puts forward two striking ideas interacting dramatically in his article The Government-Could-Not-Work-Doctrine. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:06 am
Pat Gudridge: From the front page of the New York Times: “Investors’ Suits Face Higher Bar, Supreme Court Rules. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:28 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge Professor Whitman – without doubt a leader in the field of comparative law – manifestly wishes he hadn’t learned what he’s learned: Awful as it may be to contemplate, but the reality is that the Nazis took a sustained, significant, and sometimes even eager interest in the American example in race law. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 9:16 am by Paul Horwitz
Contributors include David Dyzenhaus, Sumi Cho, Pat Gudridge, and Michel Rosenfeld.  [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:38 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge Whatever Reva Siegel writes is worth close study. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:38 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge Whatever Reva Siegel writes is worth close study. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:30 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge Gillian Metzger is convinced of “[t]he central importance of supervision. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:30 am by Pat Gudridge
Pat Gudridge In their beautifully clear essay, Duke Professors Bradley and Siegel argue that the clarity of constitutional terms—when we glimpse it—is a result of hard work, however implicit. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by Paul Horwitz
It hardly measures up to the paper, by Pat Gudridge, to which I was responding.   [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
As my friend and colleague Professor Pat Gudridge observed, the most remarkable thing about the final step in that quartet was how unremarkable Kennedy made it seem. [read post]