Search for: "Patent Litigation Group"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. is seeking a Patent Prosecution Associate to join the firm's Electrical Group in the Washington, DC office. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:16 am
” Foley & Lardner, which has received numerous honors for its intellectual property litigation, has represented U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:07 am
Related posts:Job Opening – Midlevel Patent Prosecution Associate – DCThis prominent international firm seeks a mid-level IP associate attorney with a Ph.D. in Chemistry (organic or medicinal chemistry preferred) for its Intellectual Property practice group in the Washington, D.C. office. ... [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
In short, patent litigation is a complex system made up of at least three layers: inventors and their assignees, patent plaintiffs, and technology. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:11 pm
There have been a number of studies on the growth of patent enforcement litigation in recent years and some use the number of issued patents in order to calculate a litigation rate. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
By Jason Rantanen In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation (Fed. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 am
John Chau joins the firm’s Patent practice group in Bloomfield Hills and Mary Hyde enters the Intellectual Property Litigation practice group in Ann Arbor. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:06 pm
McKinley has joined the firm as Counsel, where he will be a part of the Litigation Group. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Offit Kurman is in search of one or more multi-talented patent attorneys to help grow its intellectual property group in their Northern Virginia, Maryland and/or Philadelphia locations. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
Gregory Curfman: The Humira Patent Thicket and the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine (Source: SSRN) New Job Postings on Patently-O: Klarquist — Litigation/IPR Associate Klarquist — Chemistry Patent Attorney/Agent McKee Voorhees and Sease The Marbury Law Group, PLLC Penn State Law Cochlear Daly, Crowley, Mofford & Durkee, LLP Knobbe Martens Reinhart Fiala & Weaver P.L.L.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 11:08 am
As a Fort Lauderdale patent attorney, I closely follow patenting news relating to the medical device industry as we have several clients in this technology group. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:26 pm
Kraft Food Brands Group LLC. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 3:38 pm
Gibson, Chair, Patent Litigation Group, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLPRyan Mauck, Litigation Partner, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP Handout material: Handout material, including sample indemnity provisions and relevant cases will be made available to all participants. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
After the case was underway, FireStar apparently tired of the patent litigation game. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 8:56 am
In its initial action, the Examiner issued a restriction requirement dividing between Group I – Figs 1-4 (kennel without a cover); and Group II – Fig 5 (Kennel with a cover) — finding that the two groups are distinct embodiments and further that the single claim requirement of design patent bars the inclusion of figures having distinct combinations of elements. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:19 am
" Other people also invest in lawsuits, most notoriously so-called patent trolls (See my post of Jan. 20, 2006: trolls and litigation costs; Oct. 29, 2006: Qualcomm's business model; May 13, 2007: Microsoft's litigation against trolls; and June 25, 2008: advice against troll litigation.). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Job Opening: IP Litigation, Transactional & Patent ProsecutionWells St. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:30 pm
It joins a select group of companies, like Twitter and Newegg, that have proven willing to stand up to patent trolls. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
The CAFC addressed a Katz case and observed:In this multi-district litigation patent case, the plain- tiff Ronald A. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
A coalition of consumer advocacy and public interest groups recently filed an amicus brief at the CAFC, arguing that the PTO's "continuation rule changes" would curtail abusive behavior by patent applicants and improve patent quality.The brief continues the same themes raised in earlier amicus briefs at the district court, that endless continuations harm the public good and hinder innovation. [read post]
