Search for: "Patterson v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
If a school board may undertake such evaluations, did the board’s 1998 performance evaluation of her work constitute disciplinary action? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" No, according to the Court of Appeal's rulings in Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625 and in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
” Patterson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
In Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625, the Court of Appeals decided that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The seminal case in New York Stateregarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:54 am
Justice Albin dissented (Hitesman v Bridgeway, Inc, June 16, 2014, Patterson, A). [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:36 am
The opinion is available as DeGroat v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
