Search for: "Patterson v. New York" Results 1 - 20 of 234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
AI Regulations Hit New York City Podcast Listen to attorney Ryan Kurtz of Patterson Belknap discuss New York City Regulations addressing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring workers. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Thacker v Constantine Cannon, LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32376(U) July 14, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155930/2018Judge: James d’Auguste it is too early for the court to decide who did what. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
State of California, IHSS, legally uninsured, administered by York Risk Services Group, a Sedgwick Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:16 am by Jon L. Gelman
New York Shipping Association (A-19-22) (087217) Argued April 25, 2023 -- Decided June 5, 2023SABATINO, P.J.A.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
I also noted last week that the New York state government defendants didn't file a response to the petition. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli 2023 NY Slip Op 01812Decided on April 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a legal malpractice case concerning, as do so many other famous legal malpractice cases, real estate in New York. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
HELLMAN from Jenner & Block LLP, New York, NY represented Copyright Alliance. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
The New York Times ran this interesting article this week. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nigrelli: Another one of New York's new restrictions imposed in the immediate aftermath of the Supreme Court's Bruen decision is the private property exclusion. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
Katie Benner reports for the New York Times. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]