Search for: "Patterson v. New York" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
LoBiondo, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Kipnees, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice & Peter W. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Holmes crafted a press release that was published in the New York Post on April 7, 2009. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
The rule in New York has long been that if enough work can be completed that may only be used under the proposed permit the rights in the existing zoning have vested. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Planning Bd. of Patterson, 2016 WL 7224820 (NYAD 2 Dept. 12/14/2016)  Filed under: Access to Government, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
Courthouse News Service offers a summary of Magwood v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak… [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:13 pm by Kyle Courtney
She spent her 1L summer at Public Knowledge, a DC-based non-profit that works on IP, tech, and communications policy, and her 2L summer at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler in New York City. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:21 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
  On January 26, 2015, the Southern District Court of New York (SDNY) denied summary judgment to Defendant, a web site which had used Plaintiff’s protected photographs without authorization. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
DISKANT, Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerLLP, of New York, New York, who argued for defendants/appellants.Of some history: The case proceeded to trial and the jury returned averdict in favor of Saffran on January 28, 2011. [read post]