Search for: "Patterson v. New York"
Results 81 - 100
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 460-62 (1958). [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
The New York Times Bits Blog has coverage, Mike Madison has an interesting high-level view, and IPTAblog has the complaint. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:33 am
According to Patterson, the company violated both the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Law. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am
There’s an old saying in New York: There’s no justice on the Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
From Hardaway v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
The New York Times ran this interesting article this week. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The seminal case in New York Stateregarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
When the County Courts in New York City were merged into the New York State Supreme Court in 1962 as part of a court reorganization in 1962, Leibowitz’s title changed to New York State Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
, filed a chapter 11 petition in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:08 pm
" (See Patterson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
LoBiondo, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Kipnees, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice & Peter W. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli 2023 NY Slip Op 01812Decided on April 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a legal malpractice case concerning, as do so many other famous legal malpractice cases, real estate in New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
Holmes crafted a press release that was published in the New York Post on April 7, 2009. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
”) Patterson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:33 am
New York County 20071). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
Obsidian is therefore not required to satisfy the New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
The rule in New York has long been that if enough work can be completed that may only be used under the proposed permit the rights in the existing zoning have vested. [read post]
