Search for: "Patterson v. New York" Results 101 - 120 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
The rule in New York has long been that if enough work can be completed that may only be used under the proposed permit the rights in the existing zoning have vested. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
The rule in New York has long been that if enough work can be completed that may only be used under the proposed permit the rights in the existing zoning have vested. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Planning Bd. of Patterson, 2016 WL 7224820 (NYAD 2 Dept. 12/14/2016)  Filed under: Access to Government, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
Courthouse News Service offers a summary of Magwood v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:15 pm
Meanwhile, in Sunday's New York Times Magazine, Elizabeth Weil delivers an update here on how executions are being conducted in several states. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
Might Makes Blight In The New York Appellate Division - Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:13 pm by Kyle Courtney
She spent her 1L summer at Public Knowledge, a DC-based non-profit that works on IP, tech, and communications policy, and her 2L summer at Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler in New York City. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:21 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
  On January 26, 2015, the Southern District Court of New York (SDNY) denied summary judgment to Defendant, a web site which had used Plaintiff’s protected photographs without authorization. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Stodola MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10024 (212) 468-8000 Attorneys for Appellant Mark Dean Schwab ny-821133 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................... [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:42 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
In California, an important case relating to franchisor liability for franchisee conduct is pending before the California Supreme Court (Patterson v. [read post]