Search for: "Patterson v. New York" Results 141 - 160 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
District Court of the Southern District of New York relied on the federal common law of arbitrability rather than state-law public policy in invalidating an arbitration provision, an issue not addressed in Concepcion. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:15 am
Thanks to the IPKat's friend, Dan Glazer, of Patterson Belknap, Webb & Tyler, of New York, I think that we have found the answer. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
- Legal Arguments on Transfers and Perfection Consumer Arguments Industry Arguments New York Trust Law 1-302 of the UCC Mechanics of Transfer (Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement)? [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
The New York Times referred to him as one of nation's leading experts on evidence and procedure. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:24 am by Ben Vernia
In a redacted decision on April 5, District Judge Robert Patterson of the Southern District of New York granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Of course, in 2002 a case was started against Kramer Levin with Parish using BR., which was dismissed in Supreme Court, New York County. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
The New York Times referred to him as one of nation's leading experts on evidence and procedure. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 4:08 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
While the latter is typically thought to be tangential to the holding in the instant case, it may later be accorded persuasive value in legal argumentation and/or future decisions; in other words, it may eventually attain the status of ratio decidendi.In contrast to their English counterparts, American judges have more discretionary power to bypass or otherwise disregard constraining or binding precedent (‘relaxed’ v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
The New York Times referred to him as one of nation's leading experts on evidence and procedure. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
"   Similarly, and as discussed here, in his March 17, 2010 opinion in the CIBC subprime-related securities suit, Southern District of New York Judge William H. [read post]