Search for: "Patterson v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 12:19 pm
In the case, Hodge v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:19 pm
In the case, Hodge v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
The Judge was satisfied, in view of Ms Patterson’s “confident tone claiming [NZICA’s] superiority over CPAA”, that the audience reasonably construed her comments to mean that CPAA provided inferior education to NZICA (See [47]-[48].) [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Lyons and, ultimately, the superior court judge read it. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
See Patterson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:23 am
In Patterson v Turner, 88 AD3d 617, the court ruled that material on Facebook, if relevant, was subject to discovery while in Abrams v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Patterson case. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Patterson case. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:08 am
Ontario Superior Court Justice George Strathy has sent a large class action lawsuit to trial after a charitable tax donation “scheme” cost a retired Ontario staff sergeant more than $20,000 in reassessed taxes and interest.Michael Cannon, the representative plaintiff in Cannon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
Macrida Patterson, 52, alleges that she was hurt last May by a defective "low-rise v-string" from the Victoria's Secret "Sexy Little Thing" line, according to a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court....Jason Buccat, told TSG that a "design problem" caused the decorative piece to come loose and strike Patterson in the eye, causing damage to her cornea. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
Harrison, Patterson, O'Connor & Kinkead, No. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Henry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
The court found that the plaintiff did not consent to, or agree to excuse, a landing strip owner’s breach of its duty to design and maintain a safe airstrip, so the doctrine did not apply.In Patterson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:53 pm
Specifically, the court affirmed a superior court decision that precluded the City of Los Angeles from enforcing an affordable housing ordinance against a mixed-use project that is being developed by Palmer. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
” Distinguishing State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
The superior court held that the Costa-Hawkins Act does preempt the affordable housing requirements in the City’s Plan.The Project In 2006, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
Superior Court, in which the court noted that the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
The owner’s testimony, if believed by a trier of fact, supported reasonable inferences that there was a lack of local franchisee management independence.The decision is Patterson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:41 am
The Marion Superior Court granted Davis's motion to dismiss the criminal charges. [read post]
