Search for: "Patterson v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2017, 8:33 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
But the Sixth Circuit disagreed, relying on the two components of the "mandate rule" from United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958), which held the State of Alabama could not force the civil rights organization to disclose its membership list. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by David Markus
United States, 797 F.3d 493,502 (7th Cir. 2015), reasonable jurists can disagree about what constitutes a newjudgment under Magwood. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am by Record on Appeal
Patterson, No. 09-0378 (Nov. 5, 2010), in which the court originally held 6-2 (with Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson recused) that Texas does not recognize a "rolling" public beachfront access easement, without proof of prescription (on certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-876, Black v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 10:16 pm
But in recent United States cases, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and lower courts have upheld field-of-use licenses prohibiting activities that licensees would otherwise have been permitted by patent law, such as the repair and resale of patented products. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 4:07 pm
Patterson in courtroom 24 of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007. read more [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:39 am
Braden of the United States Court of Federal Claims, John W. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:22 pm
I have a lot of sympathy for the proposition that Univis [United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
In this declaration, Patterson explained that the database at issue `consisted of telecommunications metadata obtained from United States  telecommunications providers pursuant to administrative subpoenas served upon the service providers under the provisions of 21 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2016, 7:22 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]