Search for: "Paul Mark Sandler"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 7:56 pm
Golderg, Alex Brown, Paul Mark Sandler and Jessica L. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
Paul Mark Sandler's latest "case" might be his toughest challenge yet: His client is not only infamous but has been dead for nearly 70 years. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 1:35 pm
(First of three parts) Sound logic, or reason, can go a long way in persuading a judge or jury. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:24 am
From the Atkinson-Baker Discovery Update: "When and How to Object During a Deposition," by Paul Mark Sandler and John J. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:12 pm
The following is an excerpt of a conversation with Court of Appeals Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera from “Appellate Practice for the Maryland Lawyer: State and Federal, Fifth Edition,” edited by Paul Mark Sandler, Andrew D. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:42 pm
(Last of three parts) As logic is a powerful instrument of persuasion, so, too, is emotion. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:23 pm
Paul Mark Sandler advocates limiting pre-trial discovery. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:23 pm
Paul Mark Sandler advocates limiting pre-trial discovery. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In When and How to Object During Deposition, Art of Advocacy blogger Paul Mark Sandler writes that in civil litigation, "objection-free depositions are unheard of. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:05 pm
In the article they quote Paul Mark Sandler of Baltimore on an effective way to describe reasonable doubt in a closing argument. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:05 pm
In the article they quote Paul Mark Sandler of Baltimore on an effective way to describe reasonable doubt in a closing argument. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:08 pm
Joan Hennessy writes about cover subject Paul Mark Sandler of Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler, a top 10 lawyer who has tried many high-profile cases (including USA v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:35 pm
In his blog the Art of Advocacy, Baltimore lawyer Paul Mark Sandler suggests a counter to the slippery slope argument: "The 'slippery slope' argument falsely assumes that once you take a moderate first step in a particular direction, a catastrophic chain of events will follow. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:35 pm
In his blog the Art of Advocacy, Baltimore lawyer Paul Mark Sandler suggests a counter to the slippery slope argument: "The 'slippery slope' argument falsely assumes that once you take a moderate first step in a particular direction, a catastrophic chain of events will follow. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:45 am
Each year that you continue to be engaged in our honorable profession, you will assume more responsibilities and the demands placed on you will grow. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
Paul Weiss is reported to be one of the top-ranked national firms in terms of income, while Lowenstein Sandler is number two in New Jersey in revenue. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
By Paul Mark Sandler and John J. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 4:34 am
Direct examination is the heart of the trial. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 8:42 am
The purpose of the closing argument is to incite jurors or a judge to render the decision you request. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:36 pm
The growth of our common law evolves on a case-by-case basis, beginning in the Middle Ages during the time of Henry II in the 1160s. [read post]
