Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 101 - 120
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 12:21 pm
I would like to convince you of two things. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
The question of whether magistrates have the power to devise and impose ex ante restrictions is about the latter question, not the former one.Second, some of the briefing talks about my own scholarship in this area, and I wanted to make a brief comment about the ACLU’s reliance on Paul Ohm’s online response to my Virginia Law Review article on ex ante restrictions. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:27 am
I will save my co-blogger Derek Bambauer from tooting his own horn by tooting it for him: Paul Ohm has written a very lovely review on Jotwell of Derek’s forthcoming law review article, Condundrum. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:30 am
Paul Ohm It is rare to find satisfying cybersecurity scholarship. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:28 am
Instead, every system designer makes innumerable tradeoffs and imposes countless constraints,” note James Grimmelmann and Paul Ohm. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
Related Links Tragedy of the Data Commons, by Yakowitz Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, by Paul Ohm “Race and Romance: An Uneven Playing Field for Black Women,” Freakonomics “Facebook digs through user data and graphs U.S. happiness,” LA Times “Ok Trends: Dating Research from Ok Cupid” “Jane Yakowitz on How Privacy Regulation Threatens Research & Knowledge,” by Adam Thierer To… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
” Paul Schwartz paved the way for much of this work. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
" Paul Schwartz paved the way for much of this work.The "Privacy as a First Amendment Value" scholarship has so far focused on deterring undue state surveillance, and the casual observer of Sorrell might believe that the same concerns are not raised by IMS Health's data collection. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
Filed under: Conference Announcements Tagged: Artificial intelligence and law, Carl Malamud, Computational linguistics and law, Daniel Martin Katz, Emile de Maat, Law.gov, Legal data mining, Legal informatics conferences, Legal text mining, Michael Bommarito, Michael James Bommarito, Network analysis in legal informatics, Paul Ohm, Program on Law and Computation, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Workshop on Law and Computation [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
Brooklyn VAP Jane Yakowitz takes on Paul Ohm's reidentification paper. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:18 am
Speaking alongside the Information Commissioner are Paul Ohm from the University of Colorado, Mark Elliot from the University of Manchester as well as representatives from the Cabinet Office and the Office of National Statistics.The ICO will publish a report in the coming weeks that will summarise the seminar’s key discussion points as well as setting out next steps.Full press release here. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:27 pm
Here’s an interesting SmartPlanet interview with Paul Ohm, associate professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, in which he discusses his concerns about “reidentification” as it relates to privacy issues. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Assistant Professor Paul Ohm of the University of Colorado Law School says yes (PDF). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Technical and social data on how valid the underlying data profiles are which are used by ad networks to deliver targeted ads: are their predictions reasonable out of context (eg some in-game data collection seems to have reportedly tagged people as "risk taking" or "aggressive" ; are they verifiable and transparent ; can they be misused (eg used to target addicts or the young with inherently risky offerings); can they be de-anonymised.Since the latter seems increasingly likely… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
Consequently, her paper includes a powerful critique of the “de-anonymization” and “easy re-identification” fears set forth by the likes of Paul Ohm, Arvind Narayanan, Vitaly Shmatikov, and other computer scientists and privacy theorists. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:11 pm
(Orin Kerr) The Virginia Law Review in Brief has posted a response from Professor Paul Ohm to my recent article, Ex Ante Regulation of Computer Search and Seizure. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm
Different types of openness may well have different social consequences, potentially creating different winners and losers and different varieties of the “human flourishing” that Paul Ohm correctly emphasizes in his Symposium post. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Martin, Cornell Law School; Paul Ohm, University of Colorado Law School; Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law, University of California; Tim Stanley, Justia; Tim Wu, Columbia Law School; Robert C. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Martin, Cornell Law School; Paul Ohm, University of Colorado Law School; Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law, University of California; Tim Stanley, Justia; Tim Wu, Columbia Law School; Robert C. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
Paul Ohm (Colorado) 4. [read post]
