Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 121 - 140
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm
Essays by Paul Ohm, Viva Moffett, and Wendy Seltzer suggest that mandatory ISP collection and civil liability might cause many problems than they would solve. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
Paul Ohm has expressed skepticism about this kind of proposal. [read post]
17 May 2015, 10:13 am
Thanks to Paul Ohm and conference co-sponsor Ryan Calo for inviting me to participate, to the editors of the Colorado Technology Law Journal, and to James Grimmelmann for being a worthy interlocutor over the past almost-year and for generously unfailingly tweeting my work on Facebook despite our sometimes divergent perspectives. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:23 pm
The other is a more junior lateral or entry-level position in Env/NR/Energy.Contact person: Paul Ohm, Paul.Ohm@colorado.edu UC Davis Law School. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 2:35 pm
Submissions should be sent via email to section chair Paul Ohm at paul.ohm@colorado.edu. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 7:32 am
Other participants include law profs Paul Ohm, Ryan Calo, and James Grimmelman, Princeton Center for Internet Technology Policy Director Edward Felten, FTC Commissioner Julie Brill, and UT-Austin psychologist Tal Yarkoni. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm
“This is a very big deal,” writes law professor Paul Ohm. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
I think a more likely explanation flows from Paul Ohm’s Myth of the Superuser: many of these experts have seen what truly talented hackers can do, given sufficient time, resources, and information. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
[3] Paul Ohm, “The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online,” UC Davis Law Review 41, no. 4 (2008), 1401 [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Paul Ohm’s work: “Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7“.) __ Eric’s Comments: (1) Is it clear yet to you that the Song-Beverly Act isn’t aging well? [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Lenard, President and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law Frank A. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Ohm, Paul. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
As Paul Ohm presciently observed in 2010, the ease of reidentification of presumably anonymous data poses great threats to individual safety. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Paul Ohm argued that that legal solutions are better for cyber civil rights problems than technological solutions. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
And while scholars such as Paul Ohm note that under certain circumstances facial recognition technology that tracks a person’s movements would clearly fall under Carpenter, Andrew Ferguson’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee illustrates that facial recognition technology has different Fourth Amendment implications depending on its use. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
As detailed by Paul Ohm, she later proved just a birthdate, zip code and gender is enough to identify 87 percent of the population, and knowing where someone is makes them even easier to ID. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
Lindsey Barrett, Laura Moy, Paul Ohm and Ashkan Soltani considered the effects of the Federal Trade Commission’s outdated conflict-of-interest rules. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:54 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Tom Goldstein of this blog explains the “odd alignment” of the Court’s two majority opinions in Jones, while Paul Ohm of Freedom to Tinker characterizes the three opinions in the case as a “near-optimal result” for those who argue that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence insufficiently protects privacy in light of new technology. [read post]
