Search for: "Paul Ohm" Results 121 - 140 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 7:30 am by Adam Thierer
Consequently, her paper includes a powerful critique of the “de-anonymization” and “easy re-identification” fears set forth by the likes of Paul Ohm, Arvind Narayanan, Vitaly Shmatikov, and other computer scientists and privacy theorists. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:11 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Virginia Law Review in Brief has posted a response from Professor Paul Ohm to my recent article, Ex Ante Regulation of Computer Search and Seizure. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm by Katherine Strandburg
 Different types of openness may well have different social consequences, potentially creating different winners and losers and different varieties of the “human flourishing” that Paul Ohm correctly emphasizes in his Symposium post. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Martin, Cornell Law School; Paul Ohm, University of Colorado Law School; Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law, University of California; Tim Stanley, Justia; Tim Wu, Columbia Law School; Robert C. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Martin, Cornell Law School; Paul Ohm, University of Colorado Law School; Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law, University of California; Tim Stanley, Justia; Tim Wu, Columbia Law School; Robert C. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am by Venkat
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:56 pm by Tim Zinnecker
Colorado law prof Paul Ohm passes along this press release, announcing four finalists for the law school's deanship: Gregory Hicks (Washington), Lawrence Mitchell (George Washington),  Margaret Raymond (Iowa), and  Philip Weiser (Colorado). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:21 am by Timothy B. Lee
Paul Ohm said of the decision: "It may someday be seen as a watershed moment in the extension of our Constitutional rights to the Internet. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence Solum
--Paul Ohm, University of Colorado Law School [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 1:12 pm by Danielle Citron
Peñalver), Deborah Hellman’s Money Talks But It Isn’t Speech, Orly Lobel’s The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties and Protections for Reporting Illegality, Michael Madison, Brett Frischmann and Katharine Strandburg’s Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment, Jon Michaels’s Privatization’s Pretensions, Helen Norton’s The Supreme Court’s Post-Racial Turn Towards a Zero-Sum Understanding of… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wharton Colloquium on Media and Communications Law (papers available at link; due to a hilarious series of barriers and unforced errors, I only attended the Saturday session) Christopher Yoo, The Federal Takeover of the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm by Danielle Citron
Professor Susan Freiwald has kindly agreed to guest blog today on the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by Joshua Gruenspecht
" These cases confirm the need for Digital Due Process reforms, as CDT Fellow Paul Ohm and EFF have already noted. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Kashmir Hill
“This is a very big deal,” writes law professor Paul Ohm. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:02 am by Scott Peppet
Others have touched on it, including: computer scientists, who have studied “interactive techniques” involving active data administrators who selectively filter and disclose information; (see Paul Ohm’s Broken Promises for discussion); health regulators, who have built the (somewhat related) idea of “health information trustees” or “information custodians” into draft health information legislation; mobile technology (and other software)… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm by Blake Reid
I had the opportunity to work with Alex on the video game exemption under the excellent guidance and supervision of professors Paul Ohm, Harry Surden, and Brad Bernthal via the Glushko-Samuelson Technology Law and Policy Clinic at the University of Colorado Law School; we also received tremendous support from the Electronic Frontier Foundation and a coalition of professional and academic security researchers. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:31 am by Danielle Citron
” Rosen’s piece offers insights and potential solutions from Concurring Opinions favorites — our very own Dan Solove, guest blogger Paul Ohm, star author Jonathan Zittrain whose book The Future of the Internet (And How to Stop It) will be the focus on an online symposium in early September, and Bright Ideas scholar M. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:09 pm by Michael
Paul Ohm has a cool-looking article in the Harvard Law Review, The Right to Delete. [read post]