Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 141 - 160
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 7:32 am
Other participants include law profs Paul Ohm, Ryan Calo, and James Grimmelman, Princeton Center for Internet Technology Policy Director Edward Felten, FTC Commissioner Julie Brill, and UT-Austin psychologist Tal Yarkoni. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
[3] Paul Ohm, “The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online,” UC Davis Law Review 41, no. 4 (2008), 1401 [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Paul Ohm’s work: “Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7“.) __ Eric’s Comments: (1) Is it clear yet to you that the Song-Beverly Act isn’t aging well? [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Ohm, Paul. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Lenard, President and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law Frank A. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
As Paul Ohm presciently observed in 2010, the ease of reidentification of presumably anonymous data poses great threats to individual safety. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Paul Ohm argued that that legal solutions are better for cyber civil rights problems than technological solutions. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
As detailed by Paul Ohm, she later proved just a birthdate, zip code and gender is enough to identify 87 percent of the population, and knowing where someone is makes them even easier to ID. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
And while scholars such as Paul Ohm note that under certain circumstances facial recognition technology that tracks a person’s movements would clearly fall under Carpenter, Andrew Ferguson’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee illustrates that facial recognition technology has different Fourth Amendment implications depending on its use. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
Lindsey Barrett, Laura Moy, Paul Ohm and Ashkan Soltani considered the effects of the Federal Trade Commission’s outdated conflict-of-interest rules. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 8:02 am
Others have touched on it, including: computer scientists, who have studied “interactive techniques” involving active data administrators who selectively filter and disclose information; (see Paul Ohm’s Broken Promises for discussion); health regulators, who have built the (somewhat related) idea of “health information trustees” or “information custodians” into draft health information legislation; mobile technology (and other software)… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:54 pm
But we do need to recognize what Paul Ohm has demonstrated in his recent work: there is an inverse relationship between anonymization and utility for a broad range of data. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:28 pm
(Paul Ohm calls this "Felten's Third Law".) [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:04 am
Paul Ohm at Co-Op gives a chilling vision of world of private police, security forces that serve their employer, not the public. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
FTC Regulation: Privacy and Security During her fireside chat with Georgetown University Law professor Paul Ohm, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairwoman Edith Ramirez stated that data security is “one of the most significant challenges” society faces. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
., Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, 57 UCLA Law Review 1701 (2010). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
However, there are others, such as Professor Paul Ohm, who argue that “nonmonetary harm abounds online” and that regulators ought to be able to address those harms – even if they are more subjective in nature – provided that the harms are non-trivial. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
" These cases confirm the need for Digital Due Process reforms, as CDT Fellow Paul Ohm and EFF have already noted. [read post]
