Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 141 - 160
of 230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 7:32 am
Other participants include law profs Paul Ohm, Ryan Calo, and James Grimmelman, Princeton Center for Internet Technology Policy Director Edward Felten, FTC Commissioner Julie Brill, and UT-Austin psychologist Tal Yarkoni. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:06 am
Ohlhausen, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission- Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law- Neomi Rao, Associate Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law- Sasha Romanosky, Associate Policy Researcher, RAND Corporation- Ira Rubinstein, Research Fellow and Adjunct Professor of Law, New York University School of Law- Michael D. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 10:05 pm
The programs will go deep on critical issues like "data security, privacy, surveillance, artificial intelligence, fintech, intellectual property, and emerging technologies” according to Georgetown Law Professor Paul Ohm. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
Paul Ohm has expressed skepticism about this kind of proposal. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
[3] Paul Ohm, “The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online,” UC Davis Law Review 41, no. 4 (2008), 1401 [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Paul Ohm’s work: “Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7“.) __ Eric’s Comments: (1) Is it clear yet to you that the Song-Beverly Act isn’t aging well? [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 8:41 pm
(Don’t get me wrong–I think there is a really good case to be made for net neutrality, via the work of people like Jerry Kang (see Race.net Neutrality), Paul Ohm (focusing on privacy), and Dawn Nunziato (focusing on the First Amendment). [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:55 pm
Lenard, President and Senior Fellow, Technology Policy Institute Paul Ohm, Associate Professor of Law, University of Colorado School of Law Frank A. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
* Ohm, Paul. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
Eric has posted about Professor Ohm's reidentification work, which shows how the distinction between PII and non-PII is becoming less useful: "Data Anonymization and Re-identification Lecture Featuring Paul Ohm, SCU, April 7. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
As Paul Ohm presciently observed in 2010, the ease of reidentification of presumably anonymous data poses great threats to individual safety. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Paul Ohm argued that that legal solutions are better for cyber civil rights problems than technological solutions. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:36 am
Lindsey Barrett, Laura Moy, Paul Ohm and Ashkan Soltani considered the effects of the Federal Trade Commission’s outdated conflict-of-interest rules. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
As detailed by Paul Ohm, she later proved just a birthdate, zip code and gender is enough to identify 87 percent of the population, and knowing where someone is makes them even easier to ID. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
And while scholars such as Paul Ohm note that under certain circumstances facial recognition technology that tracks a person’s movements would clearly fall under Carpenter, Andrew Ferguson’s testimony before the House Oversight and Reform Committee illustrates that facial recognition technology has different Fourth Amendment implications depending on its use. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
However, there are others, such as Professor Paul Ohm, who argue that “nonmonetary harm abounds online” and that regulators ought to be able to address those harms – even if they are more subjective in nature – provided that the harms are non-trivial. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
., Paul Ohm, Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, 57 UCLA Law Review 1701 (2010). [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:04 am
Paul Ohm at Co-Op gives a chilling vision of world of private police, security forces that serve their employer, not the public. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Piece it all Together and You Get 5 Concurring Opinions Blog: Paul Ohm, Jones is a Near-Optimal Result Concurring Opinions Blog: Margot Kaminski, Three thoughts on U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:59 am
For good American commentary, see blog posts by Professors Paul Ohm and Orin Kerr and the Electronic Frontier Federation’s news release. [read post]
