Search for: "Paul Pfeifer"
Results 21 - 40
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2015, 10:26 am
About Paul Pfeifer, Pfeifer Law Firm:Paul Pfeifer has been practicing law since 1999. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 10:26 am
About Paul Pfeifer, Pfeifer Law Firm:Paul Pfeifer has been practicing law since 1999. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Justice Paul E. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
In a 4-3 opinion written by Justice Paul Pfeifer, the court granted Herring’s petition for post-conviction relief in this death penalty case on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to properly prepare the mitigation phase of the proceedings. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Case Background Steve Granger and Paul Steigerwald, the appellees, owned the four unit rental property at issue in this case. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm
As Ohio Supreme Justice Paul Pfeifer once colorfully said, “I never felt so much like a hooker down by the bus station … as I did in a judicial race. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Paul Pfeifer, the court held that this suit by a group of tenants against its landlords for violation of certain provisions of Ohio’s Landlord Tenant Act was a tort, and thus the cap on punitive damages codified at R.C. 2315.21(D)(2)(a) applied. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
” Justice Paul Pfeifer, to the prosecutor. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
In a 4-3 decision written by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, for himself and Justices Paul Pfeifer, Sharon Kennedy and Bill O’Neill, the court held that a child’s statement to his teachers about physical abuse constitutes testimonial evidence barred by the Confrontation Clause when the child has been found incompetent to testify. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
When he left the court, Justice Paul Pfeifer took up the mantle as chief advocate for greater protections under the Ohio Constitution, and has remained so ever since. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
In a 4-3 opinion written by Justice Paul Pfeifer, the court granted Herring’s petition for post-conviction relief in this death penalty case on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to properly prepare the mitigation phase of the proceedings. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Justice Paul Pfeifer upset many people when he announced at his final swearing-in ceremony in January of 2011 that he thought the time had come for Ohio to abolish the death penalty, and asked Gov. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Terrence O’Donnell, in which Justices Paul Pfeifer and Judy Lanzinger concurred in judgment only, the court held that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule precluded suppression of evidence obtained from a GPS placed under the defendant’s car without a warrant. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Justice Paul Pfeifer, writing for a unanimous court, rejected the state's argument (essentially that the court had previously said attempted felony murder was too a crime) and agreed with the court of appeals. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
In a 6-1 opinion written by Justice Judy Lanzinger, in which Justice Terrence O’Donnell wrote a short separate concurrence and Justice Paul Pfeifer dissented, the court held that the arrest warrants in this case were invalid because they were issued without a determination of probable cause, but suppression of the evidence was not required in the case because the police officers relied in good faith on the longstanding, appellate-court-validated, but now expressly disavowed… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Justice Bill O’Neill dissented, joined by Justice Paul Pfeifer. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:19 pm
Case Background Paul Jones and Latosha Sanders bought a new house from Centex Homes. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
What’s interesting in the case is that the opinion was written by Justice Paul Pfeifer, who in the past has made it clear that he thinks the death penalty should be abolished in Ohio and replaced with a system of life without the possibility of parole. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 2:33 pm
In his dissent, Justice Paul Pfeifer declared that the court’s decision “fits with the recent jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court” and limits the usefulness of Rule 23. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 8:30 pm
That same 6 to 1 vote held up in the reversal, with Justice Paul Pfeifer the lone dissenter. [read post]
