Search for: "Pearce v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 8:17 am by clee
On October 28, 2010, Judicial Watch filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief on behalf of Arizona State Senate President Russell Pearce with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm by Susan I. Nelson
It’s incredible to me that Russell Pearce, Governor Brewer, and other anti-immigrant groups are claiming victory in the Supreme Court’s decision today because one provision—2(B) was not struck down. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:21 pm by James J. La Rocca
(The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently became the third Appellate Court to deem President Obama’s prior appointments unconstitutional in NLRB v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by gstasiewicz
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 5th April the Court will hand-down judgment in  R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
R v Pearce rehearses the arguments which relate to questions of anonymity – or not – in the context of prosecution of a child (considered in more detail with law references here). [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:04 am by LRToday
  On March 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am by Brennan W. Bolt
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
However NM argued that Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] ECC 167 extended this duty to disclose risks where “there is a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient”[4]. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:02 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Under the United States Supreme Court decisions and our [State v. [read post]