Search for: "Pedraza v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm
Pedraza-Fariña states that patent law is the Federal Circuit's "perceived area of expertise" and she notes that non-patent areas are "characterized by high affirmance rates and deferential standards of review. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:38 pm
Relying on State v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:42 pm
In Rosalio Pedraza v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:16 pm
Walker v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Calvin Cartlidge v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
The Court of Appeals affirmed in Pedraza v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:13 am
") SC18903 - State v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:11 am
State, 2013 WY 142, 312 P.3d 827 (Wyo. 2013), and Pedraza v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
In contrast, the State urges use of less stringency, relying on State of New York v Pedraza wherein in the context of a Mental Hygiene Law article 10 probable cause proceeding, the court adopted the standard applicable at a preliminary hearing, namely, whether there exists reasonable cause to believe explaining that all the court is inquiring into at this early stage is whether there exists sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
Pedraza, 466 F.3d 932, 933 (10th Cir.2006) ( citing Spitznas v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:23 am
The style of the case is Mario Santacruz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
" Rosalio Pedraza v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
In Hotchkiss v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:23 pm
Compare In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 391 F.3d 812, 817 (6th Cir.2004) (determining whether attorneys' fees are included in "costs" by reference to the state statute that formed the basis of the suit), Pedraza v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:26 am
Compare In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 391 F.3d 812, 817 (6th Cir.2004) (determining whether attorneys' fees are included in "costs" by reference to the state statute that formed the basis of the suit), Pedraza v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:45 am
Summary of decision February 20, 2014ORDER REVERSING CONVICTIONSCase name: BLAS PEDRAZA, JR. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:20 am
Luis Pedraza Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
