Search for: "Peeks v. Peeks" Results 1 - 20 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2013, 2:15 am
Just email Policy here -- and say the IPKat sent you [Merpel remains puzzled by this whole dispute: wouldn't it be more sensible, rather than having Peek & Cloppenburg v Peek & Cloppenburg, to have both the Peeks on one side and both the Cloppenburgs on the other? [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:51 am
An early "sneak and peek" case is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:32 pm by David Priess
The Lawfare Institute is pleased to join the Michael V. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:12 am by Christopher Spizzirri
When it's a quick peek, as was ordered in ACS State Healthcare, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am by Katie Barlow and James Romoser
Mnuchin (Dec. 9) The post How a veteran sketch artist offers a peek into oral arguments in the work-from-home era appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:35 am by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) As voting continues for the 2014 Privy Awards, here’s a peek at another closely watched matchup. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
It noted, however, that compelled “quick peek” procedures, in which the producing party does not agree to the process, see Fairholme Funds Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
It noted, however, that compelled “quick peek” procedures, in which the producing party does not agree to the process, see Fairholme Funds Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
It noted, however, that compelled “quick peek” procedures, in which the producing party does not agree to the process, see Fairholme Funds Inc. v. [read post]