Search for: "Pelts v. Pelts" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2021-03-27 2021-03-28 Link to the copyright making available case, case, Tunein Inc v Warner Music UK Ltd & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 441 (26… 2021-03-28 Court Hears Arguments in Canadian Pirate Site Blocking Appeal 2021-03-28 CRTC lands another pelt fining Scott Brewer for violating CASL 2021-03-29 Defences that can be pleated against… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:45 am by Walter Olson
Above is an introductory video on King v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
National Blog Barry SookmanCASL gets Rogers Media The CRTC announced yesterday that it bagged another CASL pelt – this time Rogers Media. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 8:36 pm by Anthony McCain
: Rihanna’s “Robyn” Registration Opposed by DC Comic Doug Schoen : The Patent Process in America is Broken Joe Mullin: “Copyright trolling” Movie Studio gets hit with Godzilla-Sized Lawsuit Michael Borella : Allvoice  v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm by Anthony McCain
John Duffy: The Supreme Court Reverses Another Federal Circuit Patent Case Gene Quinn: Industry Reaction To SCOTUS Decision In Sandoz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
For that reason, this fellow loses his criminal appeal.The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am by WSLL
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: TED NOBLES v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court heard argument for the second time in the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
18 May 2018, 11:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Courts Bulletin Van Pelt III v. [read post]