Search for: "Pence v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am
… The patchwork that would likely result from state enforcement would sever the direct link that the Framers found so critical between the National Government and the people of the United States as a whole. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
U.S. support and advice to Israel has recently focused on limiting civilian deaths, and yesterday, Israeli government spokesperson Eylon Levy said, “we are going to continue with our campaign to destroy Hamas, a campaign that the United States sees eye to eye with us about. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the West Bank this week, the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am
There are so many criminal laws that do criminalize speech, and so the notion that the president of the United States somehow has a First Amendment right to be protected by the government for his speech doesn’t make any sense. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Suppose that Chesebro or Eastman had told Trump that Vice President Pence had the right to reject certified Electoral College votes from any state in which Pence unilaterally decided that the "Democrat governor of the state is a woke socialist, so we should have a do-over supervised by the US military. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Constitution requires to be eligible to serve as the President of the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
That includes United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Among other things, it completely disregards the role of the Electoral Count Act – and, even more fundamentally, of Article II of the Constitution in empowering Congress to set the “Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes, which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
§ 371 makes it illegal for two more people to "conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
The implications of the filing were captured on CNN, where host Kaitlan Collins explained that “the First Amendment does not allow the President of the United States to go and claim there was fraud when he was told there was not fraud…” That is, of course, entirely wrong. [read post]
