Search for: "Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Rather, the en banc court found no taking after faithfully applying the three-factor test of Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:28 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
As this Court confirmed in Lingle, to determine if a regulation goes too far, a court should balance three factually-intensive factors that were identified in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:02 am
City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) and Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
Whether the Ninth Circuit effectively nullified the regulatory taking doctrine recognized in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by UChicagoLaw
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
City of San Rafael, the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit considered, among other things, whether the City of San Rafael’s mobilehome rent control ordinance (the “Ordinance”) constituted either a regulatory taking under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The brief argues: Although Amici agree that the Ninth Circuit decision below completely misconstrued this Court’s decision in Palazzolo, the Ninth Circuit was able to do this end-run of Palazzolo because of the underlying incoherence in the test that was first set out in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]