Search for: "Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 7:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court found that the City of New York did not violate the Takings Clause in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court found that the City of New York did not violate the Takings Clause in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court found that the City of New York did not violate the Takings Clause in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court found that the City of New York did not violate the Takings Clause in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm
Rather, the en banc court found no taking after faithfully applying the three-factor test of Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
As this Court confirmed in Lingle, to determine if a regulation goes too far, a court should balance three factually-intensive factors that were identified in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:47 pm
The abstract: In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:00 am
Here's the abstract: In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:45 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:24 am
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:02 am
City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) and Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:01 am
In conforming to the "parcel as a whole rule" propounded in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 7:41 pm
New York City. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Gruen helped to draft the landmark preservation laws that the Supreme Court were upheld in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
City of San Rafael, the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit considered, among other things, whether the City of San Rafael’s mobilehome rent control ordinance (the “Ordinance”) constituted either a regulatory taking under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:01 am
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978). [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
New York City. [read post]
