Search for: "Penn Central Transportation Company, in the Matter of"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 8:40 am
Foy and New York Central Mutual Insurance Company Matter of Homan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The first non-per se approach to regulatory takings is the factored analysis in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The first non-per se approach to regulatory takings is the factored analysis in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
This case asks whether two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels can be combined for regulatory takings analysis under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Applying the Penn Central factors, the Court concluded that the jury could not reasonably find for the plaintiff. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Applying the Penn Central factors, the Court concluded that the jury could not reasonably find for the plaintiff. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Penn State University Faculty Ombuds Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu We have been asked to consider one statement and two questions. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Applying the Penn Central factors, the Court concluded that the jury could not reasonably find for the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
After the trial, the jury decided that there was an unconstitutional regulatory taking of the plaintiff’s property pursuant to Lucas and Penn Central. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
("Ventures") to develop an industrial park on the site of the abandoned Penn Central rail yard at the southern tip of the Bronx bordered by the Harlem River, directly opposite Manhattan. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In its Conference of January 8, 2016, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work, and whether a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order denying class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their claims with prejudice. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
In 2007, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a complaint against CRST on behalf of a class of the company’s female workers who claimed they’d been sexually harassed while employed as long-distance truck drivers. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Department of Justice News Release, July 22, 2010 Champion Chemical Company, Imperial Oil Company Inc. and Imperial’s two former officers have agreed to pay at least $1.4 million to resolve actions to enforce a prior agreement to reimburse cleanup costs incurred by the federal government at the Imperial Oil Company Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Murr implicates the Court’s regulatory takings jurisprudence, and asks whether Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host an event entitled India’s Inter-State Water Wars: Causes, Consequences, and Cures, featuring Penn Water Center Senior Fellow Scott Moore and CSIS expert Kartikeya Singh. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:10 am
Darren E. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The signalling is clear in the concurrence:çWhy does the major questions doctrine matter? [read post]
