Search for: "Pennington v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 8:05 am
  In another case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld application of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine in Kaiser Health Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
b.Did the Sixth Circuit exceed its authority under AEDPA when it applied United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
On appeal, Plaintiff–Appellant the United States (`Government’) argues that reversal is necessary because the district court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Krueger established prejudice.U.S. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 10:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc., 907 S.W.2d 472, 480 (Tex. 1995) (quoting Pennington v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:49 pm by Bona Law PC
United States explained that “The Sherman Act reflects a legislative judgment that ultimately competition will produce not only lower prices, but also better goods and services. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Noerr Motor Freight Inc., 365 U.S. 127, 137-38 (1961) and United Mine Workers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:45 am
The circumstances in which UIM coverage can be stacked and, sadly, in which it cannot were addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Pennington v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
Noerr Motor Freight (1961), which arose in the legislative context, and United Mine Workers v. [read post]