Search for: "Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
In 1921, Pennsylvania’s Kohler Act and lesser known Fowler Act, which sought to protect surface owners from anthracite coal mine subsidence and to increase tax revenue from anthracite mining, ignited the legal wrangling that eventually led to Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:35 am by Seth Jaffe
”  In other words, the original decision on regulatory takings, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:27 pm by Matthew Bush
Hirsh, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Ms. Magna Carta
  [1] Pennsylvania Coal Co v Mahon, 260 US 393 (1922) [2] Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 112 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:13 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The past ten years have been particularly fruitful, as litigants struggle with the meaning and extent of the Fifth Amendment’s Public Use Clause and the extent to which the overzealous exercise of the police power can sufficiently deprive a landowner of rights in property so that the property has been “taken” by regulation, ever since Justice Holmes opined in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 11:13 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The notion that a state or local government exercise of the police power could be a takingĀ  had its modern genesis in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]