Search for: "Pennsylvania Power & Light Company and Subsidiary Companies v. the United States"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
The two companies merged.In the process, competition in the light bulb market – and therefore the race to roll out improvements and cut prices – was severely curtailed. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The form and substance of these duties and responsibilities are considered in light of two recent developments. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The U.S. solicitor general, who sought certiorari on behalf of the United States Trustee, has argued in her brief to the Court that, between 2008 and 2016, Purdue recognized that its insolvency was looming and paid out approximately $11 billion “to the Sackler family member trusts and holding companies” in “what one family characterized as a ‘milking program’. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
– Staff, Herald Tribune, February 18, 2010 Kinder Morgan Port Manatee Terminal LLC, a subsidiary of a Houston-based company doing business at Port Manatee, has agreed to pay a $1 million penalty for violating the Clean Air Act, according to federal prosecutors. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
