Search for: "Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Administrator" Results 61 - 80 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2017, 8:04 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting question now pending before the Massachusetts high court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 26, 2011  Dickow v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justice Kavanaugh has since voted to reject review of the Pennsylvania postmark case, so perhaps with the benefit of a bit more time he has reconsidered things, but three of his colleagues continue to push the Bush v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:33 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Restrictive Covenants Unenforceable - Lessons In Drafting From Ontario Court Arkansas legislature approves bill banning abortions after 20 weeks Four peanut company managers are charged in salmonella outbreak; charges include lying to FDA Law firm’s hijacked keywords not a privacy violation, appeals court says Former PM John Turner retires from Miller Thomson Guantanamo judge gives defense lawyers access to secret detention area Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice convicted of… [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Pennsylvania, where the majority, in an opinion by Justice Thomas, held that the Trump administration’s evisceration of the contraceptive mandate (requiring no-cost contraception for all women) through broad religious and moral exemptions was supported by RFRA. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
But the Defendant repeated and widely disseminated them anyway-to make his knowingly false claims appear legitimate, create an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election. 3. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Symposium, co-sponsored by the Penn Program on Regulation, featured presentations by the nation’s foremost constitutional and administrative scholars and practitioners. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
However, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v RR Donnelley & Sons Co, race discrimination claims arising under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 were subject to a four-year statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Scott Perry (R-Penn.) is protected by the Speech or Debate Clause from the Jan. 6 criminal investigation. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel from Washington, D.C., an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that First Time US Generics LLC of Broomall, Pennsylvania infringed Effient® products, Patent Nos. 8,404,703 and 8,569,325 which… [read post]