Search for: "Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Illinois Brick Co" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am by Christine Nielsen
The Supreme Court concluded in Leegin that such agreements should be evaluated under the rule of reason; and (2) section 905(d) allows damages for indirect purchasers, which are barred in federal antitrust law under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]