Search for: "Pennsylvania R. Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Feb. 26, 2020 Wolson, J.), the court granted a Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction after finding, in part, that Pennsylvania’s statutory scheme requiring foreign corporations to consent to general personal jurisdiction in Pennsylvania by virtue of registering to do business in Pennsylvania violates the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The landscape changed dramatically, however, in 2013, with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The court provided a detailed summary of the current status of the law pertaining to personal jurisdiction based upon a review of several notable United States Supreme Court Opinions, the most recent of which was in the case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
We mentioned that undocumented workers are entitled to workers’ compensation benefits as a general rule, thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Reinforced Earth Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:54 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Lancaster of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied State Farm’s Motion In Limine to bifurcate a breach of contract and bad faith post-Koken lawsuit. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:35 am by Barbara E. Lichman
On Tuesday, November 17, 2009, Chevalier, Allen & Lichman filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of its client County of Delaware, Pennsylvania (“Delaware”). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
United States Mineral Products Co., 898 A.2d 590, 600 (Pa. 2006), "there is no strict liability in Pennsylvania relative to non-intended uses even where foreseeable by the manufacturer." [read post]