Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Bell" Results 41 - 60 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357, 365 (3d Cir. 2011)(In this decision, which is after the dismissal of the appeal by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Bugosh and before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's reaffirmation of the Restatement (Second) as the proper standard in Beard v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:27 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Bell Sports, Inc., 651 F.3d 357 (3d Cir. 2011), and "[r]ecogniz[ing] the continuing state of disrepair in the arena of Pennsylvania strict-liability design defect law"). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
  [5]On June 10, 2000, a total of 83 persons attended a catered wedding reception in Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011… [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Aaron Weems
Aaron is a resident of Fox Rothschild’s Blue Bell, Pennsylvania office and practices throughout the greater Philadelphia region. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
Bell (Army Lawyer)[See bottom of this IPBiz post]. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 10:19 am by Aaron Weems
” Helen and I engage in a lively discussion about the case, some of the background on ART cases in Pennsylvania, and what we could expect from this case (or others) as it becomes a bell weather case on ART issues. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5). [read post]