Search for: "Penry v. Lynaugh" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
In 1989, for instance, the Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am by Jon Sands
 Judge Watford disagreed that the rule was procedural -- it was instead clearly substantive to him under Penry v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am by Kent Scheidegger
  If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]