Search for: "Pension Benefit v. Pension Committee"
Results 1 - 20
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
The companies’ benefits committees were also named as defendants. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:31 am
Ziegler v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 5:06 am
Varney and Bill Fitz, being members of the DCA Employees Pension Committee representing certain of the members and former members of the Pension Plan for the Employees of Kerry (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
The CA Employees Pension Committee (the “Committee”) sought to have funds paid into the pension fund to the benefit of the DB members only. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:34 am
The argument yesterday morning in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
The argument next week in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
My analysis of the November argument in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:01 pm
The Court of Appeal had declined to award costs to the Employees Pension Committee (the “Committee”) from the trust fund as the unsuccessful party in the litigation. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
They offer defined benefit pension plans to their employees. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:50 am
Upon the denial of their appeal by the Anheuser-Busch Pension Plans Appeals Committee, they brought a class action in federal court. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:06 am
Investment Policy Committee et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:23 am
Comrie v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:51 pm
Although the question presented in Prazen v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
However, the Delaware Court of Chancery dismissed the pension fund’s derivative complaint on the basis that it failed to plead with sufficient particularity that the special committee was conflicted (City of Tamarac Firefighters’ Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:41 am
On November 6, 2019, Zamansky LLC partner Sam Bonderoff represented the participants in the employee stock-ownership plan (“ESOP”) for IBM, and argued the case of Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
A QDRO can assign rights to pension benefits under more than one pension plan of the same or different employers as long as each plan and the assignment of benefit rights under each plan are clearly specified. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
[3] Rutledge v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:47 pm
In February 2010, the Pension Committee denied Van Deventer long-term disability benefits. [read post]
