Search for: "People v. Blackburn" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm
Blackburn had entered the home of an 85-year-old woman at night, and she awoke to find him naked and lying on top of her. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
A state-run psychiatric hospital’s staffing directive, which restricted darker-skinned employees from working with a violent, racist patient, was not discriminatory, a federal district court in Washington ruled, in granting summary judgment to the employer (Blackburn v State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, September 25, 2013, Leighton, R). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
Except that charging people money for extra policing, because of a fear that thugs would react violently to their speech, is unconstitutional, see Forsyth County v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
  The latter was the holding in the peyote case (Employment Division v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The recently published Removal of bells from a closed church considers two judgments relating to St James, Church Kirk in the Blackburn Diocese; the earlier case, Re St James Church Kirk [2019] ECC Bla 4, suggested that the designation of “church treasure” was not appropriate in relation to one of the church’s bells [12, 13]. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
Jeff Blackburn, committee chairman, said Moore used his research talents to expose problems in Texas' criminal defense of low-income people. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:28 pm by Colin Murray
Through the 1980s over 500 people were convicted on the basis of evidence of numerous supergrass trials. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by Liisa Speaker
Citing Mayor of Cadillac v Blackburn, 306 Mich App 512, 522; 857 NW2d 529 (2014), the Court of Appeals concluded that because relevant statutes do not state which standard of evidence a Probate Court should require for the removal of a guardian, the default standard of a preponderance of the evidence should be applied. [read post]