Search for: "People v. Photo" Results 1 - 20 of 3,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
You just finished reading Do you need permission to sell licenses for photos of people?! [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:59 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
You just finished reading Do you need permission to sell licenses for photos of people?! [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm by Jon Katz
The post Nude photos of youngsters get people nabbed says Fairfax criminal lawyer appeared first on Jon Katz, P.C.. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:35 pm
The Court of Appeals held in People v Grajales (8 NY3d 861 [2007]) that the People are not required to give 710.30 notice of identifications of the defendant made during a photo identification procedure, such as an array The Court reasoned that because testimony regarding photographic identification procedures is not admissible, the People cannot "intend to offer at trial" such testimony. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 11:52 am by James Eckert
The complainant picked the defendant from this “lineup”, as he had done from a prior photo array. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:34 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Related posts: Court Definitively Rejects AFP’s Argument That Posting a Photo to Twitter Grants AFP a License to Freely Use It — AFP v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Now, in Naruto, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Antje Engelhardt, Ph.D. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:46 pm
Several people commented on Merlin, and now, he has an entire photo album to himself on Facebook. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The statute is aimed at (1) people who surreptitiously take photos of others and (2) those who distribute the photos knowing that they were taken without consent. [read post]