Search for: "People v. Thames" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC)This is very late as a post. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
Dobson & Ors v Thames Water Utilities Ltd (No 2) [2011] EWHC 3253 (TCC)This is very late as a post. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:26 am by Rosalind English
Dobson and others v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2011] EWHC 3253 – read judgment David Hart QC acted for the defendants in this case. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
And then there was Darby (administratrix of the estate of Lee Rabbetts deceased) v Richmond Upon Thames LBC. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:43 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R (Gaskin) v LB Richmond Upon Thames (2018) EWHC 1996 (Admin) In this case the High Court overturned a prosecution against Mr Gaskin and gave substantial guidance on fees and other points associated with HMO licensing, and by implication selective licensing, schemes under the Housing Act 2004. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Warby J held that the only safe approach to take is to assume that the readership includes lay people with no special knowledge that would affect the way they read the words complained of. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:26 am
Thame, 846 F.2d 200, 206-07 (3d Cir. 1988) (error for the prosecutor to argue that the defendant's refusal to consent to search of his bag constituted evidence of his guilt); Padgett v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
Another legal principle relied upon by the judge founded on the famous case of Armory v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
In my view, he is correct that there is insufficient here arguably to amount to an assumption of care so as to satisfy the approach in X v Hounslow or Darby v Richmond-upon-Thames. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
People v Porter, 2007 NY Slip Op 918, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by NL
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]