Search for: "People v. Vest"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Vesting health insurance rightsHandy v Schoharie County, Appellate Division 244 A.D.2d 842In the Handy case, the Appellate Division said a legislative body may adopt of a resolution that alters a retiree's health insurance benefits and that such a change can be legally applied to people who retired prior to the vote to change benefits.In December 1995, the Schoharie County Board of Supervisors adopted three motions changing its policy with respect to its providing… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
That taxonomy may have influenced the Supreme Court’s analysis of patents in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
To read the issue in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
His most famous speech comes from the case of Burden v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
" * See People v Hadid, 121 AD3d 811 ** See Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
" * See People v Hadid, 121 AD3d 811 ** See Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 3:35 am
How does the haptic vest work when the enemy is winning? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
In Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
(People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Sedar v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
It goes without saying that the status quo of the patent system is also marked by such vested interests. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
Water that is diverted for purposes of irrigation, however, 'is not deemed severed and thus remains [realty]' (13 Witkin, supra, § 91, p. 113); 'In the case of water for irrigation, delivered in ditches or pipes, the severance does not take place at all'.In a usually overlooked part of People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:37 am
Neuberger LJ held that: a) at the time of Miss Hickin’s mother’s death, “the tenant” (in this context a joint tenant) for the purposes of s.87 had not died, only one of the people comprising “the tenant” had died”; b) the 1985 Act specifically contemplated the possibility of a secure tenancy vesting by operation of survivorship (see s.88(1)(b)); c) albeit the… [read post]
