Search for: "People v. Milward" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2012, 8:42 pm by David Oliver
Admittedly, that is indeed the central teaching of Milward v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm by Steven Jensen
“This is a very important decision not only for the Milwards, but for all people who develop diseases caused by exposure to toxic substances through no fault of their own,” said Allen Stewart, founder of Allen Stewart, P.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Milward, 565 U.S. 1111 (2012), on remand, Milward v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am by Orin Kerr
Milward, which involved extremely unusual facts for a Fourth Amendment case. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Perhaps Cranor’s most notorious appearance as an expert witness resulted in the decision of Milward v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am by Schachtman
Green, “Pessimism about Milward,” 3 Wake Forest J. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Although the citation to Milward tends to inculpate, the cursory description of the challenge raises questions whether the challenge itself was valid in the first place. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 11:56 am by admin
Suppose Mary and the cigarette company stipulate that 80% of people like Mary will contract lung cancer, the burden of proof has been met. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:56 pm by Schachtman
  When the attributable risk is 95%, as it would be for people with light smoking habits and lung cancer, treating the existence of the prior risk as evidence of specific causation seems perfectly reasonable. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]