Search for: "People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If the parties were to settle after a decision is rendered, would the California Supreme Court vacate its decision and dismiss review?
18 May 2011, 7:52 pm by Brad Pauley
Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 995, 1001; People ex rel. [read post]
At the Lectern: Practicing Before the California Supreme Court - http://www.atthelectern.com/
P. v. Gonzales, S231171
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
”  (Garner, Dict. of Legal Usage (3d ed. 2011) p. 883; see also People ex rel. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES: LITIGATION PRIVILEGE
11 Oct 2009, 11:42 am by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
” (See People ex rel. [read post]
Products Liability and Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.productsliabilityinjurylawyer.com/
Interplay between punitive damages and statutory penalties/remedies?
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
Lungren v. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Court Refuses to Order Me to Remove References to Frequent Litigant from Law Review Article
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
" People ex Rel. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Letter from Amerikat: Happy Bunny Day!
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/