Search for: "People v Anderson" Results 41 - 60 of 966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
… 'What bad things will other people do if I do the right thing? [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
WIPIP session 2: ™ Doctrine, © Fair Use
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Hanover Star v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Anderson (2024): “In our democracy, we must trust the people, not unelected judges, to choose our leaders. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Kurt Lash] Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Anderson, and I'm delighted to have it published here. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The last insurrection case considered by Congress
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Scott Bomboy
Anderson, a case that arrived on an expedited basis. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Maine secretary of state appeals court ruling delaying Trump primary ballot removal
19 Jan 2024, 1:02 pm by Sean Nolan | Southwestern Law School, US
Anderson, a similar lawsuit concerning the former president’s removal from the ballot in Colorado. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Eugene Volokh] Amicus Brief Related to the Mackey "Vote-by-Text" Meme Prosecution
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Virginia v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/