Search for: "People v Brumfield"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Brumfield v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
Brumfield v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:02 am
Last Wednesday I blogged about a mash-up from Slate V, Hillary's Inner Tracy Flick (see here). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Brumfield, __ AD2d __, 9/27/13 (Fourth Dept.)2. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Yesterday she wrote a majority opinion in a death penalty case, Brumfield v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
Justice Sotomayor, Brumfield v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
If you read only the question presented as phrased by lawyers for the inmate in Brumfield v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
In the case of Brumfield v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
"I of all people would not have anything to do with Steve Patterson," he noted. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:16 am
He cites prosecuting these people as a conflict of interest. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Robin: While I was writing this book, I constantly had people, the most well meaning, liberal-minded people, tell me who Thomas is and what he thinks. [read post]
