Search for: "People v Buckman" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 2:10 pm
We’ve always been of the opinion that the rationale for preemption in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
  The insurer moved the court to strike the bad faith count on the basis that the insureds failed to allege facts, rather than mere conclusions, sufficient to support their claim.In deciding the motion to strike, the court looked to the original pleadings filed by the parties in the case of Buckman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
The recent law review article, Johns, "Informed Consent: Requiring Doctors To Disclose Off-Label Prescriptions & Conflicts Of Interest," 58 Hastings L.J. 967 (May, 2007), came to our attention because it cited Buckman (we at least glance at anything citing Buckman). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  In so doing, the court explicitly rejected the Desiano approach (which we revile), for all the right reasons – chiefly because Buckman is more than a mere pleading case and to follow Desiano would ignore the practical consequences that drove the result in Buckman. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
Still people don't seem to get it. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:48 am
Although our crystal ball is cloudy, we're calling Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Beck, et al.
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), hadn't rippled that far yet, and 2001 was the year that Buckman Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Also as to these claims, the court rejected an implied preemption claim based upon Buckman Co. v. [read post]