Search for: "People v Cahill"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Facebook Posts and Twitter Invites Don't Violate Non-Solicitation Clause -- Pre-Paid Legal v. Cahill
18 Feb 2013, 9:53 am
Cahill touted the benefits of Nerium, and he happened to be Facebook friends with people who were still associates at his former company. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:35 am
In People v Lucas (2008 NY Slip Op 07948 [10/21/08]) the Court of Appeals rejected a broad reading of its holding in People v Cahill (2 NY3d 14 [2003], in which the Court had held that it was impermissible double counting to use the intent to kill to transform the criminal trespass into a burglary in the first degree and to then use the burglary in the first degree to elevate a murder in the second degree to a murder in the first degree. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:48 pm
Test adds an additional “balancing of the competing interests” element to the Cahill test Mobilisa, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.Of the people involved:Dr. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Cahill, 884 A.2d 451, 460 (Del. 2005); Dendrite Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Cahill previewed the proceedings here. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
This heightened standard reflects the constitutionally protected `”interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:54 pm
Doe and the 2005 Delaware Supreme Court case in Doe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:27 am
People v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:08 am
People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Most states follow what is known as the Cahill test first spelled out in the Delaware case of Doe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Neuroscientists Larry Cahill, James McGaugh, and Elizabeth Parker discovered that a small number of people are able to recall detailed moment-to-moment events from their entire lives. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
Recently, in Doe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:19 am
Recently, in Doe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 1:21 am
2.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
