Search for: "People v Carrington" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 10:32 am
You don't see that many women sentenced to death in California. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 11:12 am
A lot of people have talked about the Supreme Court's small docket; Judge Harry Pregerson of the Ninth Circuit is actually doing something about it. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:45 am by Tom Smith
” In addition to the points noted by Carrington, Chemerinsky’s book contains other significant flaws, the most striking of which is his analysis of Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 288—289; Douglas, The Right of the People (1958), p. 47. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 7:35 am by James Romoser
(Philip Bump, The Washington Post) Supreme Court officially transmits its judgment overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
Carrington encouraged the addition of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
When Justice Antonin Scalia died in February 2016, they piously announced that the American People should have a voice in selecting his successor, denying a hearing to Barack Obama’s nominee, the center-left Judge Merrick Garland. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by Cian Murphy
In the 1765 case of Entick v Carrington the Lord Chief Justice declared that the law “should be clear in proportion as the power is exorbitant. [read post]