Search for: "People v Christianson" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
We further agree with defendant that his statements to the police must be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree (see People v Christianson, 57 AD3d 1385, 1388; People v James, 27 AD3d 1089, 1090-1091, lv denied 6 NY3d 895). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:58 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Instead, it finds for the plaintiff under the more traditional gender-stereotyping theory.The case is Christianson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v… [read post]