Search for: "People v Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 1,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
Under the current U.S law, owners of the AI technology itself may be the ones with cause for concern – potentially being at risk of copyright infringement lawsuits.[24] AI usually reviews or even contains reproductions of other people’s artwork that it use [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by Michael Oykhman
Where two people participate in an indecent act, the presence of a participant in the act does not meet the requirement of “in the presence of one or more persons” (see: R v Follet, 1994 CanLII 10217 (NLCA)). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Additional information is available here: Louis V Clark III was born on the Oneida reservation of Wisconsin. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 14, a criminal with an AR rifle had murdered 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The speakers were Kelly Bennett and Thom Clark from the Legal Department. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
MARLER of MARLER CLARK, LLP (pending admission pro hac vice), pursuant to MCR 2.118(A)(1), to allege and state as follows: I. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Our staff has published a “frequently asked questions” resource to demystify the rulemaking process and identify opportunities for the public to engage.22 We will also host a virtual public forum on September 8, where people will be able to provide oral remarks that will be part of the ANPR record.23 I am grateful to our agency staff for their work on this ANPR and my colleagues on the Commission for their engagement and input. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The trial tested a rarely used criminal statute meant to ensure that people comply with congressional subpoenas. [read post]