Search for: "People v Clark" Results 21 - 40 of 1,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
I'm fine to let a jury decide.But it is my firm opinion that the relevant people in the Santa Clark County Sheriff's Office belong behind bars.Here's the basic scoop:"The Penal Code authorizes, but does not require, county sheriffs to issue licenses to carry concealed weapons to applicants who are of good moral character, have good cause for a license, reside or work in the county, and have completed a specified course of training. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm by Ilya Somin
Some of the Georgia co-defendants are the same people as Trump's unindicted co-conspirators from the federal indictment, most notably Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Clark, John Eastman, and Sidney Powell. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
Some people are waving flags and watching the fireworks, proud of the America they think it is. [read post]